1. 明確完整後，再求精準。
今天討論FDT論文之摘要部分
原先的寫作為"90% CI RCIp was estimated to provide cut-score values for determining whether there is a meaningful change, after considering the practice effect...The values of 90% CI RCIp were following: selective attention [-19.9, 12.8]; alternating attention..."。
修改過後的寫作為"The minimum and maximum values of 90% (CI) RCIp across three comparisons at 4 time points were analyzed for providing the conservative criteria to interpret score changes in patients with stroke...The minimum and maximum values of 90% CI RCIp were following: selective attention [-19.9, 12.8]; alternating attention..."。
2. 投影片的標題和內容要一致。
1. 再求精簡。
回覆刪除The current revisions look comprehensive and specific.
Well preparation results in good comments.
Poor preparation results in limited comments.
2. Think about re-drawing the figure of learning effects. Figures are good ideas to show the PATTERNS of learning effects.
另外，別人聽不懂或誤解您的「問題」或「見解」，宜思考您自己的準備或表達是否完整明確。
回覆刪除傾聽/澄清別人的見解，才能看到自己的不足，進而增廣見聞與提升能力。
謝謝老師的提醒。
回覆刪除