回覆審稿者的意見

最近開始回覆SF-36審稿者之意見，審稿者真的很用心看我的文章，看的非常仔細，共問我24點問題。不僅糾正我的文字使用的錯漏，也問了許多概念上的問題。
有些問題可作為以後寫作上的提醒及在設計研究時要注意的事項，例如：
How many subjects were approached and how many agreed to participate? What is the consent rate?
How many participants were excluded due to the exclusion criteria?
Why were the exclusion criteria chosen?

有些問題還滿艱深的，真的好難回答喔!
根本不知如何下筆回覆!