欲討論之事項(12/17)

1. Reviewer 1, #1
     問題：前後文是否連貫?

前段為解釋驗證 data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability, and convergent/divergent validity之理由：
................These abovementioned psychometric properties are important for a measure to be used in both clinical and research settings.
此段為因應審稿者要加入之內容：The psychometric properties of a questionnaire are sample dependent and need to be validated in any sample that the questionnaire will be applied.¹⁷ To our knowledge, no study has examined data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability in the people with heroin abuse. Therefore, it is necessary to examine these data quality, scaling assumptions, internal consistency reliability, convergent validity, and divergent validity of the SF-36 in heroin abusers in order to verify the usage of the SF-36.
後段為方法部分

2. Reviewer 2, introduction 2
    問題：
     (1) 已刪減內容，是否內容之架構/段落仍不清楚?
     (2) Convergent/divergent validity解釋方式是否正確?在discussion section，是否要加入數據?最後結語寫法是否正確且合乎邏輯?

3. Reviewer 2, discussion 1
    問題：scale和subscale之使用解釋，是否需要再補充?