Table 1 Fit indices of the 10
domains of the ADLRS-III (n =304).
Domain
|
χ2
|
df
|
χ2/df
|
CFI
|
TLI
|
RMSEA
|
Independence
|
97.04
|
35
|
2.77
|
0.981
|
0.975
|
0.076
|
Personal
hygiene
|
153.83
|
35
|
4.39
|
0.966
|
0.957
|
0.066
|
Personal
hygiene-da
|
9.90
|
5
|
1.98
|
0.995
|
0.991
|
0.029
|
Leisure
|
146.07
|
77
|
1.90
|
0.981
|
0.977
|
0.058
|
Picture
recognition
|
55.22
|
35
|
1.58
|
0.997
|
0.996
|
0.021
|
Current
events
|
156.88
|
35
|
4.48
|
0.944
|
0.929
|
0.107
|
Current
events-da
|
18.40
|
14
|
1.24
|
0.998
|
0.998
|
0.003
|
Literacy
ability
|
42.14
|
27
|
1.56
|
0.995
|
0.994
|
0.048
|
Money
calculation
|
401.62
|
35
|
11.47
|
0.680
|
0.589
|
0.294
|
Money
calculation-da
|
9.70
|
5
|
1.94
|
0.997
|
0.995
|
0.055
|
Transportation
facilities use
|
192.92
|
35
|
5.51
|
0.961
|
0.949
|
0.088
|
Transportation
facilities use-da
|
24.07
|
9
|
2.67
|
0.992
|
0.986
|
0.051
|
Communication
tools use
|
105.88
|
35
|
3.03
|
0.981
|
0.976
|
0.068
|
Communication
tools use-da
|
22.53
|
9
|
2.50
|
0.990
|
0.984
|
0.062
|
Problem-solving
ability
|
19.85
|
5
|
3.97
|
0.989
|
0.977
|
0.094
|
Problem-solving
ability-da
|
0.855
|
2
|
0.43
|
1.000
|
1.000
|
0.000
|
Total
score of 10 domains
|
0.25
|
35
|
0.00
|
1.000
|
1.000
|
0.004
|
Total
score of 4-IADL domains
|
0.79
|
2
|
0.40
|
1.000
|
1.000
|
0.000
|
Total
score of 5 cognition-related ADL domains
|
0.08
|
5
|
0.02
|
1.000
|
1.000
|
0.079
|
The
criteria of the CFA fit index met are presented in bold.
Note:
aItems of the domains have been deleted.
Personal
hygiene剩下5題 (第4、5、6、7、9題)；Current events剩下7題 (第2、3、4、5、6、8、10題)；Money calculation剩下5題 (第1、2、3、4、5題)；Transportation facilities use剩下6題 (第3、4、5、6、7、8題)；Communication
tools use剩下6題 (第1、2、3、4、5、6題)；Problem-solving
ability剩下4題 (第1、3、4、5題)。
Table
2 Mean, SD, ceiling effect, floor effect and reliability (n=304)
Domain
|
Mean±SD
|
Ceiling effect (%)
|
Floor effect (%)
|
Internal consistency (α)
|
Independence
|
7.1±2.5
|
19.8
|
1.3
|
0.80
|
Personal hygiene-da
|
4.2±1.5
|
52.0
|
2.6
|
0.73
|
Leisure
|
6.6±2.8
|
23.7
|
2.3
|
0.79
|
Picture recognition
|
6.7±3.1
|
17.1
|
10.2
|
0.87
|
Current events-da
|
6.8±1.8
|
52.6
|
2.0
|
0.81
|
Literacy ability
|
5.3±2.9
|
4.3
|
10.9
|
0.81
|
Money calculation-da
|
2.8±1.9
|
27.3
|
23.7
|
0.85
|
Transportation tool use-da
|
4.5±1.8
|
38.2
|
5.3
|
0.79
|
Communication tool use-da
|
4.4±1.6
|
30.6
|
3.6
|
0.72
|
Problem-solving ability-da
|
4.8±2.6
|
17.8
|
10.2
|
0.82
|
Note: aItems of the domains have been deleted.
有6個面向，依據EFA之結果刪題後再執行CFA分析。結果顯示此6個面向之4個CFA指標都符合標準 (χ2/df < 3.00, CFI ≥ 0.950, TLI ≥ 0.950, and RMSEA < 0.080)。所有符合單向度的面向，進行面向總分之one-factor CFA分析，結果顯示10個面向之CFA模式成立，此10個面向分數加總可代表整體ADL狀態。此外，4個IADL面向(i.e., independence, leisure, transportation facility use, and communication tool use)和5個認知相關ADL面向(i.e., picture recognition, current events, literacy ability, money calculation, and problem-solving ability)之one-factor CFA模式成立，4個IADL面向與5個認知相關ADL面向之分數加總，分別可代表個案IADL和認知相關ADL之能力。
符合單向度模式的10個面向之Cronbach’s alpha都>0.70。然而，已刪題之5個面向 (personal hygiene、current events、money calculation、transportation tool use、communication tool use)和未刪題的leisure有ceiling effect。Leisure面向原本有14題 (每題1分)，原始總分超過10分，以10分計算。若以原始分數計算 (不刪減總分)，此面向就無明顯的ceiling effect (2.0%)。其它已刪題之5個面向可能需要增加困難度較高之項目，以區辨高功能患者之間的差異。另外，已刪題之money calculation有floor effect，此面向應加入困難度較低之項目，以區辨低功能患者之間的差異。
沒有留言:
張貼留言